[ Ol' Paw's Fishing Tackle Bulletin Board ] [ Ol' Paw's Fishing Page ]
Posted by FritzL (220.127.116.11) on March 11, 2003 at 06:22:20:
In Reply to: Fishfinder posted by DonB on February 25, 2003 at 13:52:30:
No, comparable vintage bottom-of-the-line fish finder models are not as good as the Eagle models, but the newer budget-based models can be as good as Eagle high-end models over 5 years old. The only real difference between the old Eagles & cheap-o brands is that you're apt to read air bubbles & very localized (from 1" to 2') temperature inversions of 3° or more.
The reason that the new transducers cost as much as new budget graphs is that you're looking at good transducers where the budget graphs use budget (cheaper & weaker) transducers. If you want to keep your Eagle, then spend the money on the transducer, but if you're willing to replace your old graph with a new one, then go ahead & get the Kmart/Wal-Mart graphs on sale.
I, myself, would rather keep my old Eagle Magna II than replace it with a budget-basement fish finder simply because I'm very familiar with the unit's operation, layout & menu even if it has difficulty differentiating between fish, air & thermal pockets as well as accurately reading the depth when I'm in water deeper than 90' or moving in 3' or greater swells.
See Items Repaired With Durafix
Repair Rod Demo